{"id":315,"date":"2017-10-05T08:45:40","date_gmt":"2017-10-05T13:45:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/?p=315"},"modified":"2017-10-05T08:54:15","modified_gmt":"2017-10-05T13:54:15","slug":"besides-cfm-flow-what-can-you-measure-on-a-flow-bench","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/?p=315","title":{"rendered":"Besides CFM Flow, what can you measure on a Flow Bench?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Our <a href=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/pfa.htm\">Port\u00a0Flow Analyzer<\/a> for flow bench testing has several features for making several measurements of cylinder head performance. \u00a0For head flow, pretty much anything that improves CFM flow improves the HP\u00a0potential of the head. But after measuring CFM, there are several other\u00a0measurements which can give better insight into one particular head runs\u00a0well on the dyno or the track, and another head with equal or sometimes even\u00a0less flow can run much stronger. These are the hard earned &#8220;black arts&#8221; of\u00a0head porting which many engine builders are reluctant to share. Questions\u00a0these engine builders are looking to answer include:<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>1) Have you given up too much port velocity for improving CFM flow? This\u00a0is pretty much dictated by port volume. An engine with too much port volume\u00a0has low velocities and will not make good torque at midrange RPM. There are\u00a0many simplistic &#8220;rules of thumb&#8221; on this, but the best way to know if you\u00a0have too much port volume is with a sophisticated engine simulation program\u00a0like <a href=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/Engine-Analyzer-Pro.htm\">Engine Analyzer Pro<\/a>.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_324\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-324\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-324 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Engine-Analyzer-Pro-v3.9-wo-300x209.gif\" alt=\"Engine Analyzer Pro\" width=\"300\" height=\"209\" srcset=\"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Engine-Analyzer-Pro-v3.9-wo-300x209.gif 300w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Engine-Analyzer-Pro-v3.9-wo-768x534.gif 768w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Engine-Analyzer-Pro-v3.9-wo-1024x712.gif 1024w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-324\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Engine Analyzer Pro<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>It can read\u00a0our <a href=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/pfa.htm\">Port Flow Analyzer<\/a> files which contain both CFM flow and port volumes\u00a0and tell you how the head will likely perform at various RPMs. A particular\u00a0head may have too much port volume for a smaller CID or shorter runners, but\u00a0at a different RPM, runner length, cam, etc., it may run real strong. A\u00a0simulation program will let you investigate all these trade offs.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_327\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-327\" style=\"width: 474px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-327 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Int-Close-Valve-Lift-3-pics-hi-res-474x1024.gif\" alt=\"Engine Analyzer Pro graphs of intake tuning pressures at intake valve closing\" width=\"474\" height=\"1024\" srcset=\"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Int-Close-Valve-Lift-3-pics-hi-res-474x1024.gif 474w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Int-Close-Valve-Lift-3-pics-hi-res-139x300.gif 139w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Int-Close-Valve-Lift-3-pics-hi-res-768x1660.gif 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 474px) 100vw, 474px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-327\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Engine Analyzer Pro graphs of intake tuning pressures at intake valve closing<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2) Where is the port velocity highest? This is called &#8220;port mapping&#8221; and<br \/>\nuses <a href=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/pfa.htm#Pitot Tubes\">velocity probes<\/a> to construct a map of high and low velocity areas.<br \/>\nThere is little universal agreement about how a port map should look. But<br \/>\nif the port maps are different between a good and bad head, it gives you<br \/>\ninsight on where to look. Pitot tubes are the standard method, but are<br \/>\nquite large and bulky for measuring intake flow, where they must have a 180<br \/>\ndeg bend so the tip faces the incoming flow. They are hard to get into<br \/>\ntight spaces, or into small or short ports. We have our Mini Intake tubes,<br \/>\nwhich are better, but still relatively large. This year we have developed<br \/>\nour<a href=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/Electronic-flow-bench-velocity-probes.htm\"> Electronic Velocity Probe<\/a> which are MUCH smaller and a big leap forward<br \/>\nin technology.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_318\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-318\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-318 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Pitot-tube-probe-tip-comparison-300x169.jpg\" alt=\"Port Velocity probes\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" srcset=\"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Pitot-tube-probe-tip-comparison-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Pitot-tube-probe-tip-comparison-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Pitot-tube-probe-tip-comparison-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Pitot-tube-probe-tip-comparison.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-318\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Port Velocity probes<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_328\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-328\" style=\"width: 225px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-328\" src=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Jon-w-electronic-probe-225x300.jpg\" alt=\"Velocity Probing an Intake Port\" width=\"225\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Jon-w-electronic-probe-225x300.jpg 225w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Jon-w-electronic-probe-768x1024.jpg 768w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Jon-w-electronic-probe.jpg 1064w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-328\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Velocity Probing an Intake Port<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3) Are we using all of the valve to allow flow, or is all the flow going<br \/>\nthrough just the back half of the valve? To know this, you need to measure<br \/>\nflow velocity around the entire edge of the valve. Ideally you will see<br \/>\nabout the same velocity around all 360 degrees of the valve&#8217;s head. If you<br \/>\nfind low velocity areas, that tells you you could better use the entire<br \/>\nvalve flow area if you got more flow into that area. The Plus version of<br \/>\nthe <a href=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/Electronic-flow-bench-velocity-probes.htm\">Electronic Velocity Probe<\/a> lets you mount just the tip close to the edge<br \/>\nof your valve. You can now rotate the valve at a particular lift and find<br \/>\n&#8220;lazy&#8221; low velocity areas.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_323\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-323\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-323 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/valve-curtain-flow-probe-300x124.jpg\" alt=\"Valve Curtain Area Velocity Probe\" width=\"300\" height=\"124\" srcset=\"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/valve-curtain-flow-probe-300x124.jpg 300w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/valve-curtain-flow-probe-768x317.jpg 768w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/valve-curtain-flow-probe-1024x423.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-323\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Valve Curtain Area Velocity Probe<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_319\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-319\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-319\" src=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/port-velocity-overplot-300x188.jpg\" alt=\"Valve Curtain Area Flow Velocity Graph\" width=\"300\" height=\"188\" srcset=\"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/port-velocity-overplot-300x188.jpg 300w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/port-velocity-overplot-768x480.jpg 768w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/port-velocity-overplot-1024x640.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/port-velocity-overplot.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-319\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Valve Curtain Area Flow Velocity Graph<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>4) What happens to the mixture once the air enters the chamber? These\u00a0measurements are called <a href=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/swirl.htm\">Swirl <\/a>and <a href=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/tumble_fixture.htm\">Tumble <\/a>measurements. Swirl is typically measured on 2 valve heads and Tumble on 4 valve\u00a0heads.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_326\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-326\" style=\"width: 288px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-326\" src=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Image3.gif\" alt=\"In Cylinder Swirl Definition\" width=\"288\" height=\"192\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-326\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">In Cylinder Swirl Definition<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_325\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-325\" style=\"width: 198px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-325\" src=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Image2.gif\" alt=\"In Cylinder Tumble Definition\" width=\"198\" height=\"192\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-325\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">In Cylinder Tumble Definition<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Again, every head porter has their own theories on what works on\u00a0their particular heads. However, on race motors it is clear you do NOT go\u00a0for maximum swirl or tumble. At high RPM there is so much motion due to<br \/>\nsquish and piston motion, that added motion tends to throw the fuel out on\u00a0the walls. Some engine builders will actually design for the minimum swirl.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_320\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-320\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-320 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Swirl-USB-300x126.jpg\" alt=\"USB Swirl Meter\" width=\"300\" height=\"126\" srcset=\"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Swirl-USB-300x126.jpg 300w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Swirl-USB-768x322.jpg 768w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Swirl-USB-1024x429.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Swirl-USB.jpg 1674w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-320\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/swirl.htm\">USB Swirl Meter<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_322\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-322\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-322\" src=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Tumble-Latest-Design-2-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"Tumble Fixture\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Tumble-Latest-Design-2-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Tumble-Latest-Design-2-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Tumble-Latest-Design-2-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Tumble-Latest-Design-2.jpg 1599w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-322\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"http:\/\/performancetrends.com\/tumble_fixture.htm\">Tumble Fixture<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Our Port\u00a0Flow Analyzer for flow bench testing has several features for making several measurements of cylinder head performance. \u00a0For head flow, pretty much anything that improves CFM flow improves the HP\u00a0potential of the head. But after measuring CFM, there are several other\u00a0measurements which can give better insight into one particular head runs\u00a0well on the dyno &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/?p=315\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Besides CFM Flow, what can you measure on a Flow Bench?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[93,98,95,94,96,97],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=315"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":332,"href":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315\/revisions\/332"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/performancetrends.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}